NSGA-II Portfolio Optimization: A Comparison of Shariah Stocks (JII70) and Conventional Stocks (LQ45)

Authors

  • Delila Nasywa Ramananda Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Author
  • Dwi Eko Waluyo Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Author
  • Ana Kadarningsih Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Author
  • Suhita Whini Setyahuni Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69714/aqjrqs74

Keywords:

Multi-Objective Optimization, NSGA-II, Shariah Stocks, Conventional Stocks, Efficient Frontier, Risk-Adjusted Return, Indonesian Capital Market

Abstract

This study analyzes and compares the performance of shariah and conventional stock portfolios in the Indonesian capital market using the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) method. The study uses daily closing stock price data from January 3, 2022, to December 30, 2025, which was processed into measures of return and risk as the basis for portfolio construction. Optimization was performed by maximizing expected return and minimizing risk to generate an efficient frontier. Portfolio performance was then evaluated using the Sharpe Ratio, Sortino Ratio, and Omega Ratio. The results show that the shariah stock portfolio outperformed the conventional stock portfolio, as evidenced by a Sharpe Ratio of 0.15 compared to 0.04. Nevertheless, a combination portfolio consisting of shariah stocks and conventional stocks yielded the best overall performance, with a Sharpe Ratio of 0.15, a Sortino Ratio of 0.22, and an Omega Ratio of 1.56. These findings indicate that diversification between shariah and conventional stocks can enhance portfolio efficiency and generate more optimal performance compared to using each group of stocks separately. Thus, the NSGA-II method has proven effective in generating optimal portfolios to support investment decision-making in the Indonesian capital market.

References

[1] H. Tjiwidjaja, “Optimization of Investment Portfolio Returns Through an Integrated Risk Management Approach,” J. Acad. Sci., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 853–863, 2025.

[2] M. R. Nisardi, H. Husain, and A. Resky, “Penentuan Portofolio Saham Optimal Menggunakan Metode Markowitz Sebagai Dasar Keputusan Investasi,” Sq. J. Math. Math. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2024.

[3] F. Seru and A. D. Saputro, “Pendekatan Optimalisasi Portofolio dengan Capital Asset Pricing Model dan Model Markowitz sebagai Strategi Investasi Cerdas bagi Investor Milenial,” JOMTA J. Math. Theory Appl., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 214–224, 2024, doi: 10.31605/jomta.v6i2.4117.

[4] D. E. Waluyo, S. Fitriyyatul, A. History, and U. D. Nuswantoro, “Portfolio optimization using mean-variance model and single index model: Evidence from Indonesian and Malaysian capital markets,” Asian Econ. Financ. Rev., vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1731–1747, 2025, doi: 10.55493/5002.v15i11.5662.

[5] H. Li and N. Shi, “Application of Genetic Optimization Algorithm in Financial Portfolio Problem,” Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/5246309.

[6] S. I. Abdullahi, “Islamic equities and COVID-19 pandemic: measuring Islamic stock indices correlation and volatility in period of crisis,” Islam. Econ. Stud., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 50–66, 2021, doi: 10.1108/ies-09-2020-0037.

[7] M. Alamgir and M. C. Cheng, “Co-Movement and Performance Comparison of Conventional and Islamic Stock Indices during the Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Era,” Risks, vol. 11, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3390/risks11080146.

[8] I. Sadat and S. Gormus, “Divergent impacts of financial factors on Islamic vs conventional stock markets: insights from advanced countries using MM-QR,” J. Cap. Mark. Stud., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 6–27, 2025, doi: 10.1108/JCMS-06-2024-0030.

[9] D. Puspita, A. Kolkiewicz, and K. S. Tan, “Markowitz-based Shariah compliant portfolio model with stochastic purification and probabilistic compliance screening constraints,” J. Islam. Account. Bus. Res., vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1300–1323, 2023, doi: 10.1108/JIABR-08-2021-0230.

[10] F. Mathlouthi and S. Bahloul, “Co-movement and causal relationships between conventional and Islamic stock market returns under regime-switching framework,” J. Cap. Mark. Stud., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 166–184, 2022, doi: 10.1108/JCMS-02-2022-0008.

[11] K. Nyakurukwa and Y. Seetharam, “Leveraging sentiment connectedness for portfolio optimisation: a minimum connectedness approach,” Rev. Behav. Financ., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 908–917, 2025, doi: 10.1108/RBF-03-2025-0125.

[12] T. Hidayat, B. Oktavian, and R. Baharuddin, “Keputusan Investasi Berdasarkan Literasi Keuangan, Pengetahuan Investasi dan Persepsi Risiko,” J. Sci. Soc. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 441–452, 2023.

[13] D. T. Lim, K. W. Goh, and L. H. Lee, “A new class of Shariah-compliant portfolio optimization model: diversification analysis,” AIMS Math., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 20933–20965, 2023, doi: 10.3934/math.20231066.

[14] L. Swinkels and T. Markwat, “Corporate carbon emissions data for equity and bond portfolios,” Manag. Financ., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 118–139, 2024, doi: 10.1108/MF-02-2023-0077.

[15] Z. Chen, “Index Model with Modern Portfolio Theory and its Application to Find Optimal Portfolio in the American Stock Market,” Highlights Business, Econ. Manag., vol. 24, pp. 2015–2023, 2024.

[16] C. Henriques, “Exploring the trade-off between liquidity , risk and return under sectoral diversification across distinct economic settings,” J. Risk Financ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 130–152, 2021, doi: 10.1108/JRF-05-2020-0101.

[17] M. Jabeen and S. Kausar, “Performance comparison between Islamic and conventional stocks : evidence from Pakistan ’ s equity market,” ISRA Int. J. Islam. Financ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJIF-07-2020-0150.

[18] C. A. Rinaima, N. Fauziyah, A. N. Kamilah, and S. Economic, “OPTIMIZING SHARIA INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS USING MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY : A CASE STUDY OF ICBP AND SIDO IN INDONESIA,” Airlangga Int. J. Islam. Econ. Financ., vol. 8, no. 02, 2025.

[19] J. Ginting and Staenly, “Constructing Efficient Frontiers in Cryptocurrency Market Using Long-Run GARCH Volatility,” Zero J. Sains, Mat. dan Terap., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 546–554, 2025, doi: 10.30829/zero.v9i2.25928.

[20] Q. Gao and A. Kresta, “FI N A N SE EMPIRICAL STUDY OF MULTI-OBJECTIVE RISK PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION BASED ON NSGA-II,” J. Financ. Financ. Law, vol. Special Is, no. S1, pp. 61–75, 2024, doi: 10.18778/2391-6478.S1.2024.04.

[21] M. Ikhlef and M. Aider, “MULTIOBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY METAHEURISTIC APPROACH TO THE CONSTRAINED PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM,” Pesqui. Operacional, vol. 43, pp. 1–23, 2023, doi: 10.1590/0101-7438.2023.043.00266962.

[22] H. Asgari and J. Behnamian, “Presenting a self-adjusting algorithm for optimizing the stock portfolio according to the fundamental index,” J. Model. Manag., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1656–1689, 2025, doi: 10.1108/JM2-01-2024-0032.

[23] M. Edil, A. Sukor, and A. A. Halim, “Portfolio optimisation of Shariah- compliant samples in the USA,” J. Islam. Account. Bus. Res., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 34–57, 2022, doi: 10.1108/JIABR-10-2021-0278.

[24] J. W. M. Mwamba, L. M. Mbucici, and J. C. Mba, “Multi-Objective Portfolio Optimization: An Application of the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III,” Int. J. Financ. Stud., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.3390/ijfs13010015.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

NSGA-II Portfolio Optimization: A Comparison of Shariah Stocks (JII70) and Conventional Stocks (LQ45). (2026). Journal of Management Economics and Financial Accounting, 2(1), 54-75. https://doi.org/10.69714/aqjrqs74