PENGARUH KUALITAS AUDIT, TRANSISI ENERGI, DAN KOMITE AUDIT TERHADAP UKURAN PERUSAHAAN DENGAN ESG DISCLOSURE SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69714/cdqb8x93Keywords:
audit quality, energy transition, audit committee, ESG disclosure, firm sizeAbstract
This study examines the influence of audit quality, energy transition, and audit committee on firm size, as well as the moderating role of ESG disclosure in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. A quantitative approach was applied using secondary data obtained from annual reports and sustainability reports for the 2020–2024 period. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression and moderated regression analysis (MRA). The results show that audit quality, energy transition, and audit committee each have a significant positive effect on firm size. Furthermore, ESG disclosure strengthens these relationships by enhancing the credibility and transparency of corporate reporting. These findings provide empirical evidence of how governance mechanisms and sustainability practices jointly support firm development, offering practical implications for improving disclosure strategies and strengthening corporate accountability.
References
N. M. A. Cahyani, K. Redita, and R. Rinaningsih, “The role of audit committee attributes in enhancing environmental, social, and governance disclosure standards,” Curr. J. Kaji. Akunt. dan Bisnis Terkini, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 338–353, 2024, doi: 10.31258/current.5.2.338-353.
S. M. Sirin and B. N. Yilmaz, “Energy transition and non-energy firms’ financial performance: Do markets value capability-based energy transition strategies?,” Energy Economics, vol. 136, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107658.
A. Rahmawati, A. Indahingwati, and A. D. G. S., “Pengaruh kemampuan teknis auditor terhadap kualitas informasi laporan keuangan,” EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan), vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 441–461, 2021, doi: 10.24034/j25485024.y2020.v4.i4.4198.
A. A. Silviani, K. Kamaliah, and M. Wiguna, “Pengaruh ESG disclosure terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan: Sustainability committee sebagai pemoderasi,” AKTSAR Jurnal Akuntansi Syariah, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 227, 2024, doi: 10.21043/aktsar.v7i2.29027.
R. Pernamasari and A. Chariri, “Characteristics of the audit committee and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance in Indonesian companies,” KnE Social Sciences, vol. 9, no. 21, pp. 286–302, 2024, doi: 10.18502/kss.v9i21.16716.
A. Azahra and H. Hasnawati, “The effect of ESG disclosure, audit quality, and internal audit on company value,” Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 150–164, 2024, doi: 10.59141/jiss.v5i02.992.
F. Kholillulloh, C. K. Wardana, F. H. Fatchan, and N. P. Aji, “Audit committee characteristics, external audit quality, and ESG performance,” Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 434–445, 2025, doi: 10.22219/jaa.v8i3.39350.
A. G. Sondakh et al., Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Penerbit Akademik, 2025.
A. Ihbal and L. M. Ifada, “The mediating effect of ESG performance on board structure and financial performance: Evidence from Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 339–354, 2024, doi: 10.24843/JIAB.2024.v19.i02.p10.
D. A. Sabrina, S. Sriyono, and R. Yulianti, “The effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure on basic material company financial performance,” Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 98–114, 2025, doi: 10.21831/jim.v22i1.81565.
J. Barney, “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99–120, 1991, doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108.
M. C. Jensen and W. H. Meckling, “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 305–360, 1976.
N. M. Machdar and D. Nurdiniah, “The influence of reputation of public accounting firms on the integrity of financial statements with corporate governance as the moderating variable,” Binus Business Review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 177–186, 2021, doi: 10.21512/bbr.v9i3.4311.
M. C. Suchman, “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 571–610, 1995, doi: 10.2307/258788.
L. E. DeAngelo, “Auditor size and audit quality,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 183–199, 1981, doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1.
D. Kurniawan, N. M. Machdar, A. H. Manurung, and L. H. Sangapan, “Pengaruh enterprise risk management disclosure terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan profitabilitas sebagai variabel mediasi,” Journal of Capital Market and Banking, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2025, doi: 10.63607/jcmb.v13i2.6.
E. Natali, D. Maharani, and N. M. Machdar, “Literature review: Pengaruh independensi, skeptisisme, dan akuntabilitas terhadap kualitas audit,” Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Akuntansi, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 186–199, 2024, doi: 10.54066/jrea-itb.v2i2.1852.
C. Dang, Z. Li, and C. Yang, “Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance,” Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 86, pp. 159–176, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006.
E. S. Putri and N. P. Aji, “Pengaruh kinerja lingkungan, tipe industri, green innovation, ukuran perusahaan, dan kepemilikan asing terhadap environmental disclosure,” El-Mal: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 705–725, 2025, doi: 10.47467/elmal.v6i2.7128.
N. M. Machdar, “Kualitas audit, independensi auditor, dan pengendalian internal terhadap kualitas laporan keuangan dengan profitabilitas sebagai variabel moderasi,” Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi, dan Ekonomi, 2023.
J. P. Indriyani and N. Hasanah, “Pengaruh komite audit, ukuran perusahaan, dan fee audit terhadap kualitas audit,” Jurnal Nusa Akuntansi, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 700–715, 2024, doi: 10.62237/jna.v1i3.99
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
