PENERIMAAN PLATFORM QUIZIZZ DALAM PEMBELAJARAN INFORMATIKA: INTEGRASI TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) DAN INTRINSIC MOTIVATION INVENTORY (IMI) PADA SMPN 3 SUSUKAN BANJARNEGARA

Authors

  • Titi Safitri Maharani Universitas Perwira Author
  • Rujianto Eko Saputro Universitas Amikom Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69714/fr8t0r75

Keywords:

Academic motivation , IMI , Quizizz, SmartPLS, TAM

Abstract

The use of technology in education has rapidly developed, particularly in assessment methods. This study aims to analyze the acceptance of Quizizz in learning by applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) approaches. Data were collected from 222 respondents at SMPN 3 Susukan who actively used Quizizz and were analyzed using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) method. The analysis results show that in the TAM model, Attitude Toward Using (AM) had the strongest influence on Behavioral Intention (BI) (β = 0.744; p < 0.001), while Self-Efficacy (SE) and Technology Facilitating Conditions (TF) significantly influenced Perceived Ease of Use (PEU). However, Perceived Usefulness (PU) and PEU did not have a significant effect on BI. Meanwhile, the IMI model showed that intrinsic motivation has not formed a strong structural pattern in explaining technology acceptance. The study concludes that cognitive-perceptual factors are more dominant than affective-motivational factors in influencing acceptance.

References

Safitri Maharani T, Ekos Saputro R, “Analisis Penerimaan Pengguna Quizizz pada SMPN 3 Susukan Banjarnegara dengan menggunakan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) yang diperluas, Vol. 5, No. 9, September 2025, Hal. 2078-2889, https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.1017,

E. P. J. KlEynhans, “The value of academic labour; [Die waarde van akademiese arbeid],” Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe, vol. 60, no. 4, 2020.

Yılmaz, “The effect of technology integration in education on prospective teachers’ critical and creative thinking, multidimensional 21st century skills and academic achievements,” Participatory Educational Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 163–199, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.17275/per.21.35.8.2

K. F. Hew and C. K. Lo, “Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis,” BMC Med Educ, vol. 18, no. 1, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z.

B. Ayçiçek and T. Y. Yelken, “Classroom Life Perception Scale: A Scale Development Study1,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 253–264, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.29333/IJI.2021.14115A.

W. Wai Than, E. Mon Kyaw, and H. Zaw Htoo, “A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modelling on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology in Higher Education,” International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, vol. 2, no. 4, 2020.

P. Puspita Sari, J. Wijaya Kusuma, K. Kunci, M. Gamifikasi, K. Komunikasi Matematik, and M. Belajar, “Application Of Quizizz-Assisted Gamification Model to Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills and Learning Motivation,” Jurnal Derivat, vol. 11, no. 2, 2024.

H. Rokhaniyah, D. Ardiyanti, and N. Hidayat, “Quizizz-online gamification on learning engagement and outcomes in English lecturing process,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1408–1416, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v14i2.29992.

Burić and L. E. Kim, “Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student motivational beliefs: An analysis using multilevel structural equation modeling,” Learn Instr, vol. 66, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101302.

M. O. Alassafi, “E-learning intention material using TAM: A case study,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 61, pp. 873–877, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.457.

Y. Si, B. Wang, and A. Kawczyński, “Cooperation and competition enhance implicit sequence learning differently,” Learn Motiv, vol. 89, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102090.

F. J. Rondan-Cataluña, J. Arenas-Gaitán, and P. E. Ramírez-Correa, “A comparison of the different versions of popular technology acceptance models a non-linear perspective,” Kybernetes, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 788–805, May 2015, doi: 10.1108/K-09-2014-0184.

Maita and S. Majid, “Analisis Penerimaan terhadap Penggunaan E-Learning Menggunakan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” Jurnal Sistim Informasi dan Teknologi, pp. 30–35, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.37034/jsisfotek.v4i1.120.

B. Chimbo and L. Motsi, “The Effects of Electronic Health Records on Medical Error Reduction: Extension of the DeLone and McLean Information System Success Model,” JMIR Med Inform, vol. 12, p. e54572, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.2196/54572.

M. Recinos, K. O’Hara, A. Tiwari, D. J. Whitaker, C. Wekerle, and S. Self-Brown, “The use of technology and mobile health apps in child maltreatment interventions: Perspectives of TF-CBT therapists and SafeCare providers,” Child Protection and Practice, vol. 3, p. 100075, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100075.

W. Peng and K. Robinson-Tay, “Assessing the characteristics and outcomes of perceived usefulness and ease of use for autonomous vehicle adoption,” Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav, vol. 111, pp. 391–408, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.014.

R. Watson and T. J. H. Morgan, “An experimental test of epistemic vigilance: Competitive incentives increase dishonesty and reduce social influence,” Cognition, vol. 257, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106066.

X. F. Reyes Trelles, P. I. Alvarado Cevallos, K. P. Calle Torres, and J. N. Galarza Parra, “Academic procrastination in Ecuadorian university students: An explanatory model based on academic motivation,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 24, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40787.

R. B. Ikhsan, Y. Fernando, H. Prabowo, Yuniarty, A. Gui, and E. A. Kuncoro, “An empirical study on the use of artificial intelligence in the banking sector of Indonesia by extending the TAM model and the moderating effect of perceived trust,” Digital Business, vol. 5, no. 1, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.digbus.2024.100103.

T. Marta, Heri Mulyono, and Irsyadunas, “Analisis Penerimaan Siswa Terhadap Penggunaan Google Classroom Dengan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” Decode: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 30–37, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.51454/decode.v3i1.71.

Alsehaimi, A. Waqar, A. abd El Aal, S. Hayat, F. Ahmed Waris, and O. Benjeddou, “Optimising construction sector performance: A study of the rapidly growing global drone industry using smart PLS approach,” Journal of Engineering Research (Kuwait), 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jer.2024.08.004.

K. James, N. Betty, M. J. Thaddeo, and J. B. Kirabira, “Blood production factors affecting transfusion sustainability: A study by using smart PLS-SEM approach,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 10, no. 1, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100247.

Jahan, K. T. Kamal, P. Bhattacharjee, H. Md. Muhtasim Taqi, and Dr. S. Mithun Ali, “Improving Consumer Awareness for reducing Food Waste using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) approach,” Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, p. 100282, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100282.

R. Yang and H. Yagi, “Evaluating occupational values in Japan’s urban farming: A comparison between the Likert scale and Best-Worst Scaling methods,” Cities, vol. 155, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105485.

S. Sukendro et al., “Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410.

T. Teo, X. Fan, and J. Du, “Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Does gender matter? Background,” 2015.

W. J. Obidallah et al., “Beyond the hype: A TAM-based analysis of blockchain adoption drivers in construction industry,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 19, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38522.

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Pearson Higher Ed. R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being,” American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78, 2000.

Predyasmara, dkk. (2022) Applying Quizizz in Online English Learning: How it Improves Intrinsic Motivation. TELL (Teaching English and Language Learning Journal), 10(2), 139-150.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-13

How to Cite

PENERIMAAN PLATFORM QUIZIZZ DALAM PEMBELAJARAN INFORMATIKA: INTEGRASI TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) DAN INTRINSIC MOTIVATION INVENTORY (IMI) PADA SMPN 3 SUSUKAN BANJARNEGARA (Titi Safitri Maharani & Rujianto Eko Saputro, Trans.). (2026). Jurnal Riset Teknik Komputer, 3(1), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.69714/fr8t0r75