PERBEDAAN PERSEPSI ANTARA MAHASISWA SENIOR DAN MAHASISWA JUNIOR MENGENAI PROFESI AKUNTAN PADA PROGRAM STUDI S1(PADA MAHASISWA AKUNTANSI UNIVERSITAS WIJAYA KUSUMA SURABAYA)

Authors

  • Dinda Rolesa Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Author
  • Wiwin Wahyuni Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69714/c9d8t313

Keywords:

Student Perceptions, Accounting Profession , Senior Students , Junior Students , Accounting Education

Abstract

The accounting profession plays a vital role in the business and economic world as a provider of accurate financial information to support decision-making. In the face of changes in the business environment and technological advances, students' perceptions of this profession are important because they are the future professionals. This study aims to compare the perceptions of senior and junior students in the Accounting Program at Wijaya Kusuma University in Surabaya toward the accounting profession. Differences in perspectives between the two groups are believed to be influenced by academic experience, exposure to the workplace, and understanding of the challenges of the accounting profession. The method used is descriptive comparative with a quantitative approach. Data was collected through questionnaires distributed to first-year and final-year students, then analyzed to identify differences in perceptions. The results show that senior students have more realistic and critical views, while junior students tend to be idealistic and optimistic. These differences are related to the greater internship experience and interaction with practitioners experienced by senior students. These findings emphasize the importance of practical experience and case-based learning in shaping mature perceptions. This study provides valuable insights for curriculum development and career development strategies to prepare graduates to face the dynamics of the accounting profession and strengthen the integration of theory and practice in accounting education

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-21.

Akbar (2021). Tingkat Kesadaran Mahasiswa terhadap Kesetaraan Gender. Jurnal Egalita

Ali, M. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2014). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach. Pearson.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chan, S. (2012). Accounting and Ethics. New York: Routledge.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business Research Methods (12th ed.).

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed

Fitriani, R. (2019). Persepsi mahasiswa akuntansi terhadap profesi akuntan. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi, 7(1), 45-56.

Hidayat, R., & Prasetyo, A. (2021). Pengaruh persepsi mahasiswa terhadap kesiapan karir akuntan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 9(2), 120-130.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Panduan pengembangan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Ibrahim, A. (2020). Analisis Hasil Belajar Dan Masa Studi Mahasiswa Calon GuruMatematika. ALGORITMA Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(1), 29-46.

Irfay, & PD. (2020). Analisis perbedaan persepsi antara mahasiswa junior dan senior mengenai profesi akuntan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 8(1), 55-70.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Kurniawan, D. (2019). Pengaruh Pengalaman Belajar Terhadap Persepsi Mahasiswa Akuntansi Mengenai Profesi Akuntan. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi, 7(1), 45-56.Mahasiswa. Jurnal Kultura, 2(8), 216–220.

Matlin, M. W. (1989). Cognition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

McGraw-Hill Education. Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Mulyadi. (2016). Akuntansi Keuangan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Nugroho, R., & Sulistyowati, E. (2022). Persepsi mahasiswa akuntansi terhadap profesi akuntan publik. Jurnal CoB, 5(2), 145-160.

Nurhayati, S. (2018). Persepsi mahasiswa akuntansi terhadap profesi akuntan di eradigital. Jurnal Akuntansi Modern, 14(3), 200-210.

Nurhayati, S. (2018). Persepsi mahasiswa akuntansi terhadap profesi akuntan di era digital. Jurnal Akuntansi Modern, 14(3), 200-210.

Piaget, J. (1954). The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior (17th ed.). Pearson.

Sari, D. P. (2018). Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap profesi akuntan di era digital. Jurnal Akuntansi Modern, 14(3), 200-210.

Sari, D., & Putra, I. (2020). Perbedaan persepsi mahasiswa senior dan junior

Sarwono, S. W. (2010). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (7th ed.). Wiley.

Setiawan, A. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Solso, R. L. (1988). Cognitive Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryani, L. (2011). Peran Gender dalam Dinamika Perubahan Sosial di Kalangan

Susanto, H. (2020). Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Profesi Akuntan dan Dampaknya Pada Kesiapan Karir. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(2), 123-134.terhadap profesi akuntan. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 8(1), 75-85. Tinggi. Jurnal Usahid Solo.

Walgito, B. (2003). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Warren, C. S., Reeve, J. M., & Duchac, J. (2014). Accounting (26th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Warren, C. S., Reeve, J. M., & Duchac, J. (2017). Financial & Managerial Accounting. Cengage Learning.

Zahidah et al. (2023). Kesadaran Kesetaraan Gender di Lingkungan Perguruan

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30

How to Cite

PERBEDAAN PERSEPSI ANTARA MAHASISWA SENIOR DAN MAHASISWA JUNIOR MENGENAI PROFESI AKUNTAN PADA PROGRAM STUDI S1(PADA MAHASISWA AKUNTANSI UNIVERSITAS WIJAYA KUSUMA SURABAYA) (Dinda Rolesa & Wiwin Wahyuni , Trans.). (2025). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 2(4), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.69714/c9d8t313