PERANCANGAN ARSITEKTUR ENTERPRISE SISTEM INFORMASI AKADEMIK SMK IBRAHIMY 1 SUKOREJO MENGGUNAKAN METODE TOGAF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69714/ngr86815Keywords:
Enterprise Architecture, TOGAF, Academic Information System, ADM, SMK IbrahimyAbstract
The growing reliance on information technology in educational management has encouraged institutions to reorganize academic services in a more structured, accurate, and integrated manner. SMK Ibrahimy 1 Sukorejo faces similar challenges, as most academic processes are still carried out partially and are not supported by a standardized information system. This condition leads to data duplication, inefficient workflows, and delays in providing information to stakeholders. This study aims to design an enterprise architecture for the Academic Information System (AIS) that serves as a structured and sustainable guideline for academic system development. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed using the TOGAF framework through the stages of the Architecture Development Method (ADM). Data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis within SMK Ibrahimy 1 Sukorejo. The results indicate that the proposed architecture successfully maps academic business processes comprehensively, identifies data and application requirements, and formulates a technology architecture aligned with the school’s operational needs. The resulting architectural blueprint is expected to provide a foundation for developing an integrated and adaptive Academic Information System that supports the enhancement of educational service quality at SMK Ibrahimy 1 Sukorejo.
References
The Open Group, TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition, Reading, UK: The Open Group, 2022.
The Open Group, Applying the TOGAF® Standard – TOGAF Series Guide, Reading, UK: The Open Group, 2023.
J. A. Zachman, “The Zachman framework for enterprise architecture,” Zachman International, 2020.
M. Lankhorst, Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 5th ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2022.
J. W. Ross, I. M. Sebastian, and C. M. Beath, “How to develop a great digital strategy,” MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 7–9, 2021.
D. Minoli, Enterprise Architecture for Digital Transformation, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2022.
A. Surendro, Arsitektur Enterprise untuk Organisasi Modern, Bandung, Indonesia: Informatika, 2021.
R. Yunis and A. Surendro, “Enterprise architecture model for educational institutions using TOGAF ADM,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 489–496, 2020.
S. Kotusev, The Practice of Enterprise Architecture, 2nd ed. Melbourne, Australia: Leanpub, 2021.
K. C. Laudon and J. P. Laudon, Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm, 17th ed. New York, NY, USA: Pearson, 2023.
I. Sommerville, Software Engineering, 11th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2020.
R. S. Pressman and B. R. Maxim, Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 9th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2020.
M. Fowler, UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language, 4th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 2020.
E. Turban, R. Sharda, D. Delen, and J. E. Aronson, Decision Support Systems and Business Analytics, 11th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2021.
A. R. Hevner, “A three-cycle view of design science research,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2020.
S. Gregor and A. R. Hevner, “Positioning and presenting design science research,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2020.
S. Alter, “The work system theory: Overview and evolution,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 438–471, 2020.
R. H. Hall, Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes, 11th ed. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2021.
A. Abdillah and Jogiyanto, Sistem Informasi: Konsep dan Aplikasi, ed. revisi. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Andi, 2020.
H. Jogiyanto, Analisis dan Desain Sistem Informasi, ed. terbaru. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Andi, 2022.
R. Setiawan, “Pengembangan sistem informasi akademik terintegrasi pada sekolah menengah,” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Pendidikan, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 87–96, 2021.
S. Prasetyo and A. Nugroho, “Enterprise architecture planning for academic information systems using TOGAF,” Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 2023.
M. S. Huda et al., “Digital transformation in education: An enterprise architecture perspective,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, pp. 12345–12362, 2023.
A. Wijaya and R. Kurniawan, “TOGAF-based enterprise architecture design for vocational schools,” International Journal of Information Technology and Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 55–64, 2024.
S. Kotusev, “TOGAF is not an enterprise architecture framework,” IEEE Software, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 89–92, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Riset Teknik Komputer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
