INTEGRASI PEMIKIRAN HEGEL DAN MARX DALAM PERSPEKTIF PSIKOANALITIK: STUDI KONSTRUKSI FILSAFAT SLAVOJ ŽIŽEK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69714/z98atf79Keywords:
Integration of Hegel and Marx, Lacan's Psychoanalytic, Slavoj ŽižekAbstract
This research aims to outline the integration of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Karl Marx's thoughts in Slavoj Žižek's philosophy through Jacques Lacan's psychoanalytic perspective. The main focus of the research is to understand how Žižek combines Hegel's dialectic that emphasises process, difference and contingency with Marx's materialism critique that has been considered too teleological, and enriches his analysis with Lacan's theory of the unconscious to answer contemporary socio-political issues more sharply and relevantly. The method used is a literature study by collecting data from books, journals, and trusted academic sources that discuss the thoughts of Žižek, Hegel, Marx, and Lacan. The data was analysed qualitatively with a descriptive and interpretative approach to explore the meaning and interrelationship of philosophical concepts in Žižek's philosophical construction. The results show that Žižek reconstructs Hegel's dialectic as an ontological foundation that emphasises contingency and uncertainty, while criticising the teleology of classical Marxism. He develops the concept of active and passive dialectical subjects, and uses Lacan's psychoanalysis to analyse ideology and the structure of subjectivity in modern capitalism. This approach results in a radical and applicable contemporary dialectical materialism, providing a framework for critical analysis of 21st century socio-political realities.
References
Adian, D. G. (2011). Setelah Marxisme: Sejumlah Teori Ideologi Kontemporer. Penerbit Koekoesan.
Al Azis, M. R. (2021). Dialektika Hegel (Tesis-Antitesis-Sintesis) Dalam Etika Dan Filsafat Berkomunikasi Era Kontemporer. Jurnal Komunikasi, 12(2), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.31294/jkom.v12i2.10472
Fadillah, N. A. (2023). Memahami Teori Sosial Karl Marx: Kelas, Konflik, dan Perubahan. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humanioral, 1(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11111/nusantara.xxxxxxx
Indah, A. V. (2017). Kekerasan Sistemik Pada Masyarakat Modern Tinjauan Filsafat Slavoz Zizek. Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 3(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.31332/zjpi.v4i1.996
Koli, D. D. (2020). Kritik Ideologi dan Subjek Menurut Slavoj ŽiŽek (Vol. 2507, Issue February) [Ilmu Teologi]. http://repository.iftkledalero.ac.id/684/1/
Lukman, L. (2011). Proses Pembentukan Subjek: Antropologi Filosofis Jacques Lacan. PT Kanisius.
Nanto, Y. D. B., & Madung, O. G. (2024). Slavoj Zizek’s Criticism of Neoliberalism and Radical Political Subjects. Jurnal Filsafat, 34(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.89626
Pangestutiani, Y. (2018). KRITIK TERHADAP HEGEL (oleh Karl Marx dan Soren Aabey Kierkegaard) Yuni. Spiritualis: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Dan Tasawuf, 3(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.53429/spiritualis.v4i1.45
Priyanggono, Nayoko Bagus dan Yuwana, S. (2022). Subjektivitas Tokoh Utama Dalam Film Get Out Karya Jordan Peele: Kajian Teori Subjek Slavoj Zizek. Sapala, 9(1), 87–97. file:///C:/Users/ADMIN/Downloads/45216-Article Text-78800-1-10-20220218.pdf
Wattimena, R. A. A. (2011). Slavoj Žižek Tentang Manusia Sebagai Subjek Dialektis. Orientasi Baru, 20(1), 61–83. https://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/job/article/view/1274
Zizek, S. (2012). Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. Verso.
Žižek, S., & Milbank, J. (2009). The monstrosity of Christ: paradox or dialectic. The MIT Press
