KETIKA AI MENJADI MESIN HOAKS: SIAPA YANG BERTANGGUNG JAWAB?

Authors

  • Nathanael Orlando Situmorang Universitas Gadjah Mada Author
  • M. Ferdyan Pratama Universitas Gadjah Mada Author
  • R. N. M. Abyaz Fayyaza Universitas Gadjah Mada Author
  • Adelia Khairunisa Darmadi Universitas Gadjah Mada Author
  • Hafiz Abbad Alhaim Universitas Gadjah Mada Author
  • Haidar Bintang Bahran Universitas Gadjah Mada Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69714/tj9rzq79

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Hoaxes, Legal Responsibility, Adaptive Regulation, Digital Literacy

Abstract

The rapid development of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology in Indonesia not only facilitates human activities but also poses serious threats through the massive production and dissemination of hoaxes in digital spaces. This article aims to analyze the mechanisms of generative AI technology (such as deepfakes and disinformation bots) in producing hoaxes, map the legal and ethical responsibilities of relevant actors, evaluate the readiness of national regulations and digital literacy, and formulate systemic solutions. This paper employs a mixed-methods approach, combining secondary content analysis of 5,000 verified hoax posts (quantitative) with a normative juridical method through legislative analysis (qualitative). The findings reveal that platform recommendation algorithms accelerate the spread of hoaxes up to six times faster than authentic news, driven by automated bot activity (61% of viral trends) and a 550% surge in deepfake content. Furthermore, a legal vacuum exists, as the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) and the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP) have yet to specifically regulate the accountability of developers, platforms, or users in AI governance. This article recommends the implementation of a hybrid verification system (AI NLP with 92–97% accuracy combined with human fact-checkers), the establishment of adaptive regulations mandating algorithmic transparency, the creation of an independent supervisory body, and the acceleration of national digital literacy programs.

References

[1] M. Fatima, M. N. Khan, and S. Abbas, “AI-generated misinformation in the election year 2024: Measures of European Union,” Frontiers in Political Science, vol. 6, Art. no. 1451601, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpos.2024.1451601.

[2] C. Juditha, “Artificial intelligent dan hoaks: Tantangan disrupsi bagi literasi digital masyarakat di komunitas online dan upaya antisipasi pemerintah,” Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Informasi dan Komunikasi, vol. 9, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.56873/jimik.v9i1.531.

[3] X. Nan and S. Park, “Generative AI and misinformation: A scoping review of the role of generative AI in the generation, detection, mitigation, and impact of misinformation,” AI & Society, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00146-025-02620-3.

[4] S. W. Nurdin and I. F. Nugraha, “Ancaman deepfake dan disinformasi berbasis AI: Implikasi terhadap keamanan siber dan stabilitas nasional Indonesia,” JIMR: Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 73–92, 2025, doi: 10.62668/jimr.v4i01.1551.

[5] K. Oscar and Z. A. Hoesein, “Mendorong regulasi adaptif dan progresif untuk menghadapi penyalahgunaan artificial intelligence di Indonesia,” Journal of Innovative and Creativity, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 31501–31511, 2025.

[6] A. Renaldi, R. Imayan, M. Muda, and A. Razzaq, “Analisis pengaruh teknologi kecerdasan buatan terhadap penyebaran berita hoax di media sosial,” NAAFI: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 1039–1047, 2025, doi: 10.62387/naafi.v1i6.326.deep fake

[7] I. N. D. Sabela, A. Saputra, and W. Kuncoro, “Hoaks berbasis kecerdasan buatan AI sebagai tantangan literasi media sosial,” RELASI: Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 44–54, 2026, doi: 10.69957/relasi.v6i01.2679.

[8] J. Tefa, A. R. Haq, W. Guruh, B. Febriyanto, and A. E. Augustia, “Analisis penyalahgunaan teknologi deepfake dalam penyebaran hoaks digital,” JRIIN: Jurnal Riset Informatika dan Inovasi, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 2127–2131, 2025.

[9] C. Vaccari and A. Chadwick, “Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news,” Social Media + Society, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2056305120903408.

[10] C. von Sikorski and M. Hameleers, “Disinformation in the age of artificial intelligence (AI): Implications for journalism and mass communication,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2025, doi: 10.1177/10776990251375097.

[11] Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital Republik Indonesia, “Indeks Literasi Digital Indonesia 2024,” Jakarta, Indonesia, 2024.

[12] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2024.

[13] S. Vosoughi, D. Roy, and S. Aral, “The spread of true and false news online,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1146–1151, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.

[14] D. M. J. Lazer et al., “The science of fake news,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1094–1096, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998.

[15] R. Chesney and D. Citron, “Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security,” California Law Review, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 1753–1820, 2019.

[16] A. F. Hidayat dan M. R. Ramadhan, “Tantangan regulasi kecerdasan buatan (Artificial Intelligence) dalam sistem hukum Indonesia,” Jurnal RechtsVinding, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2024.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-09

How to Cite

KETIKA AI MENJADI MESIN HOAKS: SIAPA YANG BERTANGGUNG JAWAB? (Nathanael Orlando Situmorang, M. Ferdyan Pratama, R. N. M. Abyaz Fayyaza, Adelia Khairunisa Darmadi, Hafiz Abbad Alhaim, & Haidar Bintang Bahran, Trans.). (2026). Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu, 3(3), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.69714/tj9rzq79