INTEGRATING THERAPEUTIC ARCHITECTURE AND OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN DRUG REHABILITATION DESIGN: A SPATIAL AND OCCUPATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR RECOVERY AND REINTEGRATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69714/esbbmn53Keywords:
Drug rehabilitation center, Therapeutic architecture, Occupational therapy, Healing environment, Social reintegration, Behavioral-based design, Real-world simulationAbstract
The increasing prevalence of substance use disorders (SUD) in Indonesia is not matched by adequate rehabilitation facilities, highlighting the need for more effective and holistic approaches. This study proposes an integrated design strategy for a drug rehabilitation center by combining therapeutic architecture with occupational therapy (OT) to support recovery and social reintegration. Using a qualitative design-based research approach, the study translates behavioral characteristics of users and rehabilitation processes into spatial and architectural strategies. Therapeutic architecture principles such as natural lighting, ventilation, and connection to nature are applied to enhance emotional stability and reduce stress [11][2]. Occupational therapy is implemented through structured activity-based programming to rebuild daily routines and meaningful occupations [1][9]. A key contribution of this study is the integration of hospitality-based programs and mangrove-based activities as forms of real-world occupational engagement. These programs enable users to develop vocational skills, social interaction, and adaptive behaviors within a controlled yet realistic environment. The findings demonstrate that architecture can function as an active therapeutic system when integrated with occupation-based programming, facilitating behavioral transformation, reducing relapse risk, and supporting long-term recovery through the integration of spatial design, meaningful activity, and environmental context.
References
[1] American Occupational Therapy Association, “Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 74, no. Supplement 2, Art. no. 7412410010, 2020, doi: 10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001.
[2] C. C. Andrade, M. L. Lima, A. S. Devlin, dan B. Hernández, “Is it the place or the people? Disentangling the effects of hospitals’ physical and social environments on well-being,” Environment and Behavior, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 299–328, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0013916518792122.
[3] D. M. Alongi, “Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests,” Annual Review of Marine Science, vol. 6, pp. 195–219, 2014, doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135020.
[4] D. Best, J. Irving, dan K. Albertson, “Recovery and desistance: What the emerging recovery movement in the alcohol and drug area can learn from models of desistance from offending,” Addiction Research & Theory, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.1080/16066359.2016.1185661.
[5] E. Chrysikou, Architecture for psychiatric environments and therapeutic spaces. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2014.
[6] N. Doroud, E. Fossey, dan T. Fortune, “Recovery as an occupational journey: A scoping review exploring the links between occupation and recovery for people with mental health conditions,” British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 372–383, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0308022618765200.
[7] E. R. C. M. Huisman, E. Morales, J. van Hoof, dan H. S. M. Kort, “Healing environment: A review of the impact of physical environmental factors on users,” Building and Environment, vol. 58, pp. 70–80, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.016.
[8] D. Pati, T. E. Harvey, dan T. Thurston, “The impact of the built environment on patient outcomes and experience: A systematic review,” HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 44–76, 2021, doi: 10.1177/19375867211016068.
[9] R. Twinley, Illuminating the role of occupational therapy in addiction recovery. London: Routledge, 2020.
[10] R. S. Ulrich, “View through a window may influence recovery from surgery,” Science, vol. 224, no. 4647, pp. 420–421, 1984, doi: 10.1126/science.6143402.
[11] R. S. Ulrich et al., “A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design,” HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 61–125, 2008, doi: 10.1177/193758670800100306.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











