BIOPHILIC ARCHITECTURE APPROACH FOR A THE SCIENCE LIBRARY IN MEDAN CITY AS A LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION TO ENHANCE USER PRODUCTIVITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69714/sfja9s40Keywords:
Biophilic Architecture, Learning Space, Medan City, Productivity, Science LibraryAbstract
The low level of science literacy and utilization of public educational facilities in Indonesia, particularly in the city of Medan, demonstrates the need for the development of more productive and human-centered learning spaces. Science libraries no longer function solely as repositories of information, but have evolved into active, collaborative learning spaces and centers for knowledge production. This study aims to examine the application of biophilic architecture in the design of science libraries as an attempt to increase user productivity. This study is qualitative and based on literature reviews and case studies of educational buildings and libraries that apply biophilic principles. The analysis is descriptive and thematic in order to identify the relationship between biophilic architectural principles, the nature of the science library space, and its impact on users' cognitive, psychological, and social aspects. The research results show that the integration of biophilic elements, both through direct connection with nature, analogies to nature, and spatial experiences, contributes positively to increasing users' concentration, comfort, creativity, and quality of interaction. The biophilic architectural approach has the potential to transform science libraries into sustainable, adaptive, and productive learning environments that are relevant to the social and environmental context of the city of Medan.
References
[1] Peters, T. & D'Penna, K. (2020). Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: A critical review of literature and design recommendations. Sustainability, 12(17), 7064. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177064
[2] Zhong, Z., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2021). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114–141.
[3] Alvares, L. & Tarapanoff, K. (2023). Perspective chapter: Science and technology libraries in the age of open science – scenarios for the new protagonism of science and technological information. New Trends and Challenges in Open Data . https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1001302
[4] Doty, C. & Majors, K. (2025). Science libraries today: An update on arl institutions. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship(110). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2883
[5] Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2014). 14 patterns of biophilic design: Improving health and well-being in the built environment. New York, NY: Terrapin Bright Green LLC.
[6] Azizah, M. I., Putrie, Y. E. & Samudro, H. (2025). Adaptable biophilic design for informal learning spaces: Cultivating comfort and inspiration for marginalized communities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1439(1), 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1439/1/012018Z.
[7] Zurhidayati, Z., Imamora, M. & Jamilus, J. (2025). School library management in improving students' science literacy skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 6(2), 889-899. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v6i2.3724.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











