MODEL KOMUNIKASI ANTI-RADIKALISME BERBASIS RAGAM BAHASA PERSUASIF, DIALOGIS, DAN HUMANIS, DALAM MENGURANGI KERENTENAN WACANA MASYARAKAT SERTA SINERGI BAHASA PARTISIPASI DAN COUNTER-NARRATIVE STRATEGY DALAM UPAYA  SOSIALISASI  BAHAYA RADIKALISME RUANG PUBLIK DIGITAL

Authors

  • Ahmad Riyadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau Author
  • Andhika Fikri Ananda Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau Author
  • Zalfa Hawwari Adhar Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau Author
  • Sarah Nur Pauziah Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau Author
  • Nurul Indah Lestari Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau Author
  • Rezy Yulia Ramadhani Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau Author
  • Sri Murniati Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69714/018gxw96

Keywords:

Anti-Radicalism, Digital Communication, Language Styles, Counter-Narrative

Abstract

The digital world is currently highly vulnerable to the spread of radical ideologies packaged through sophisticated algorithms and deceptive emotional messages. This paper aims to design a new communication pattern that is more humanistic, engaging, and persuasive to protect the public from these negative influences. We use a mixed-methods research approach to thoroughly analyze field data and existing theories. The results show that an honest, open-for-discussion, and dignity-respecting approach is far more effective at breaking extremist narratives than simply banning content. In conclusion, combining engaging language styles with active citizen participation across various media platforms is the primary key to building strong community resilience on the internet.

 

References

A. Asyari and K. Kadri, “Counter-radicalization in early childhood through effective communication between education stakeholders in Bima,” Jurnal Tatsqif, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2020, doi: 10.20414/jtq.v18i1.2262.

K. Ferguson, “Countering violent extremism through media and communication strategies,” Reflections, vol. 27, pp. 28, Mar. 2016.

D. Hartmann, S. M. Wang, L. Pohlmann, and B. Berendt, “A systematic review of echo chamber research: Comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes,” J. Comput. Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–50, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s42001-025-00381-z.

U. Islam and N. Walisongo, “Metode penelitian gabungan kuantitatif kualitatif (mixed methods),” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2016.

T. Kritis and T. Istilah, “Campuran (mixed method) dalam riset sosial,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 103–118, 2018, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3552026.

R. Puspita, “Kontra-radikalisasi pada media sosial dalam perspektif komunikasi,” Jurnal Komunikasi Universitas Gagut, vol. 6, pp. 509–529, 2020.

K. Rahmawati and H. Heriyanto, “Contra radicalism through the interpreting verse of jihad (case study on NU Online platform),” Journal of Terrorism Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.7454/jts.v5i2.1068.

R. Rustandi and K. Muchtar, “Analisis framing kontra narasi terorisme dan radikalisme di media sosial,” Jurnal Komunikatif, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 134–153, 2020.

M. Sabiq, I. Iskandar, A. Burhanuddin, and A. Arisnawawi, “Transformasi perilaku kelompok radikal ke moderat di era digital,” Equilibrium: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 96–108, 2025, doi: 10.26618/equilibrium.v13i1.17188.

C. Sari, P. Dewi, D. W. Astuti, N. N. Syamila, and M. Parhan, “Membangun kampus toleran: Solusi pencegahan radikalisme melalui pendidikan kritis dan dialog terbuka dalam perspektif Islam,” AL-MUSTAQBAL: Jurnal Agama Islam, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 11–24, 2025.

A. H. Ummah, “Digital media and counter narrative of radicalism,” Jurnal Theologia, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 233–256, 2020, doi: 10.21580/teo.2020.31.2.6762.

P. Widjanarko, J. A. Chusjairi, and U. Paramadina, “Transmedia-organizing in preventing/countering violent extremism (P/CVE) initiatives in Indonesia,” Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 138–163, 2025.

M. Yesilada and S. Lewandowsky, “Systematic review: YouTube recommendations and problematic content,” Internet Policy Review, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.14763/2022.1.1652.

M. L. Kent, “Fostering dialogic engagement: Toward an architecture of dialogic communication on social media,” Social Media + Society, 2021.

P. Widjanarko, “Social media and preventing/countering violent extremism: Case studies on media-based P/CVE initiatives,” Frontiers in Communication, 2025.

G. O. Adebayo, “Counter-radicalization policies and policing in education,” ScienceDirect, 2021.

Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN), Lessons learned from alternative narrative campaigns, European Commission, 2022.

A. Etaywe, “Relational dynamics in violent extremist incitement: A semiotic approach,” SAGE Journals, 2025.

J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed Methods. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-03

How to Cite

MODEL KOMUNIKASI ANTI-RADIKALISME BERBASIS RAGAM BAHASA PERSUASIF, DIALOGIS, DAN HUMANIS, DALAM MENGURANGI KERENTENAN WACANA MASYARAKAT SERTA SINERGI BAHASA PARTISIPASI DAN COUNTER-NARRATIVE STRATEGY DALAM UPAYA  SOSIALISASI  BAHAYA RADIKALISME RUANG PUBLIK DIGITAL (Ahmad Riyadi, Andhika Fikri Ananda, Zalfa Hawwari Adhar, Sarah Nur Pauziah, Nurul Indah Lestari, Rezy Yulia Ramadhani, & Sri Murniati, Trans.). (2026). Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu, 3(1), 134-138. https://doi.org/10.69714/018gxw96