JUDICIAL REVIEW PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG PENODAAN AGAMA

Authors

  • Fatimah Azzahra UIN Sultan Syarif Hidayatullah Author
  • Naela Rosita UIN Sultan Syarif Hidayatullah Author
  • Amiratunil Khaira UIN Sultan Syarif Hidayatullah Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69714/dnpy5a78

Keywords:

Judicial Review, Constitutional Court, Blasphemy

Abstract

The judicial review of Law No. 1/PNPS/1965 on the Prevention of Religious Abuse and/or Blasphemy has sparked significant legal and constitutional discourse in Indonesia. This law, which was enacted during the Guided Democracy era, has often been criticized for conflicting with post-amendment constitutional norms, particularly those related to human rights and religious freedom. The purpose of this study is to examine, from a multidisciplinary legal perspective, the Constitutional Court's interpretation and reasoning in three major decisions: Case No. 140/PUU-VII/2009, No. 84/PUU-X/2012, and No. 56/PUU-XV/2017. Using a normative juridical approach and descriptive qualitative method through library research, this paper analyzes the arguments presented by the petitioners, the government, and the Court, including dissenting and concurring opinions. The findings of this study indicate that the Court consistently upheld the constitutionality of the blasphemy law, arguing for the importance of public order and religious harmony. However, the rulings also reveal an ongoing tension between majority religious interests and the protection of minority rights. This study concludes that while the law remains valid, its application risks undermining legal certainty, equality before the law, and freedom of religious expression in a pluralistic society.

References

Achmad, & , M. (2013). Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Judicial Review) Pada Mahkamah Agung Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11070

Admin. (2015). Implementasi Rekomendasi Kunci terkait Penodaan Agama di Indonesia; antara Tantangan dan Peluang. Balitbangdiklat. Kemenag.Go. Id. https://balitbangdiklat.kemenag.go.id/berita/implementasi-rekomendasi-kunci-terkait-penodaan-agama-di-indonesia-antara-tantangan-dan-peluang

Azni, A., Hafis, M., Zakariah, A. A., Harmanto, A., Miftahuddin, M., & Ihsan, M. (2025). Pseudo-Maṣlaḥah and Epistemological Failure in Marriage Dispensation at Indonesian Religious Courts. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 13(2), 1399–1420. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i2.2047

Butt, S. (2020). Constitutional Recognition Of “Beliefs” In Indonesia. Journal of Law and Religion, 35(3), 450–473. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2020.39

Cekli Setya Pratiwi, D. (2018). Penjelasan Hukum Asas – Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik. Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi untuk Independensi Peradilan (LeIP).

Crouch, M. (Ed.). (2022). Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia. Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192870681.001.0001

Hafis, J. dan M. (2024). Hukum Keluarga Islam: Dalam Kajian Fiqih Mu’asyarah Zaujiyah. PT Penamuda Media.

Hafis, M. (2022). Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Contra Legem Di Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru Dalam Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah [Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta]. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/view/creators/Muhammad_Hafis,_S=2EH=3ANIM=2E=253A_20203012020=3A=3A.html

Hafis, M. (2023). Kajian Terhadap Asas-Asas Teologis Dalam Surah An-Nisa’ Ayat 129 Tentang Aturan Konkrit Monogami. Jurnal Kajian Dan Pengembangan Umat, 6(2), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.31869/jkpu.v6i2.4888

Hafis, M. (2024). KONKRITISASI ATURAN MUNAKAHAT DI INDONESIA (Keselarasan antara “Hukum Islam” dan “Hukum Nasional”). PT Penamuda Media.

Hafis, M., & Johari, J. (2022). Maqasid Al-Syariah Sebagai Problem Solver Terhadap Penetapan Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 22(3), 1522. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v22i3.2420

Hafis, M., Nelli, J., & Elmiati, N. (2023). AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP PERUBAHAN PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN DALAM PERATURAN MENTERI AGAMA NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2018. Hukum Islam, 22(2), 1. https://doi. org/10. 24014/jhi.v22i2.19436

Haq, T., & Mat Isa, N. A. N. (2024). From Combating Religious Blasphemy to Promoting Peace: Reflections on the Role of Islamic Da’wah and Law in Indonesia’s Pluralistic Society. International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS), 3(2), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.59683/ijls.v3i2.95

Hasani, I., & Halili, H. (2022). Human Rights and Constitutionality Issues of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(2), 406. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1927

Hoktaviandri, H., Suatri, S., B., I., Ningsih, S. S., Effauzi, M., & Ritonga, M. (2024). Diversity and Urgency of Religious Moderation Education According to the Public Perception. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 8(2), 505. https://doi. org/10. 35723/ajie.v8i2.506

Indrayanti, K. W., & Saraswati, A. A. A. N. (2022). Criminalizing and penalizing blasphemy: the need to adopt a human rights approach in the reform of Indonesia’s blasphemy law. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi. org/10. 1080/23311886. 2022.2104704

Joshua Suherman, & Muhammad Hafis. (2023). OBLIGATION TO ATTEND WITNESS IN RELIGIOUS COURTS AND ITS RELEVANCE TO IBNU HAZM’S VIEWS. Jurnal Ilmiah Ahwal Syakhshiyyah (JAS), 4(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.33474/jas.v4i2.18909

Juliani Syafitri, & Siti Mariam Ulfah. (2024). Ecocentrism as Reconciliation of The Exploitation of Women and Nature by Capitalist Anthropocentrism: A Review of The Interpretation of Al-Tahrir wa Al-Tanwir. Al-’Allāmah: Journal of Scriptures and Ulama Studies, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.70017/al-allmah.v1i1.1

Mahatir Manese, R. (2020). Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan di Indonesia dalam Kacamata Kebijakan Publik. Journal of Governance Innovation, 2(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.36636/jogiv.v2i1.389

Masykur, M. H., Lailam, T., & Mulyono, F. I. (2025). Taking perspective between Indonesia and Germany: the establishment of quo vadis house of worship. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(1), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i1.36688

Meliala, N. C. (2018). Ketidakjelasan Kriteria Penodaan Agama dalam Pasal 156 huruf a KUHP: Quo Vadis Lex Certa? Hukum Online. Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ketidakjelasan-kriteria-penodaan-agama-dalam-pasal-156-huruf-a-kuhp-quo-vadis-lex-certa-lt5b90b2ec6e2bf?page=2

Mufidah, M., Hartiwiningsih, H., Isharyanto, I., & Wardi, M. (2024). Islamic Law and the Blasphemy Debate in Contemporary Indonesia. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 24(2), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v24i2.41287

Muhammad Hafis, Elmiati, N., & Syafitri, J. (2024). Contemporary Issues of Islamic Family Law: The Waithood Phenomenon and the Impact of the Sex Recession in Indonesia in Review of Sadd al-dzari’ah. Legitima : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 7(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.33367/legitima.v7i1.6178

Muhammad Hafis, & Jumni Nelli. (2022). an Interpretive Review of Interfaith Marriages and Validity in Indonesia Election. Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 7(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v7i2.2707

Mujaddidi, S. (2021). Constitutionality of Human Right Limitation on Constitutional Court Decisions. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(3), 539–607. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1833

Nelli, M. H. dan J. (2023). Hukum keluarga Islam Indonesia: konsep maslahah terhadap perkembangan hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia. Deepublish.

Novi Mayangsari, & Muhammad Hafis. (2022). PERSEPSI KELUARGA SAKINAH BAGI PASANGAN SUAMI ISTRI YANG BELUM MEMILIKI ANAK (Studi Kasus Di Dusun Lebanisuko Desa Lebanisuko Kecamatan Wringinanom Kabupaten Gresik). Jurnal Ilmiah Ahwal Syakhshiyyah (JAS), 4(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.33474/jas.v4i2.19007

Nurdin, N. (2017). DELIK PENODAAN AGAMA ISLAM DI INDONESIA. International Journal Ihya’ ’Ulum Al-Din, 19(1), 129. https://doi. org/10. 21580/ihya.18.1.1745

Petri, D. P., & Klocek, J. (2025). External and Internal Threats to the Freedom of Religion or Belief of Indigenous Peoples in Latin America. Religions, 16(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020209

Pratiwi, C. S. (2021). Rethinking the Constitutionality of Indonesia’s Flawed Anti-Blasphemy Law. Constitutional Review, 7(2), 273. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev724

Puspaningrum, F. D., & Adhi, C. T. (2023). A Comparative Study of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia and America: Religious and Legal Aspects. Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society, 2(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v2i1.59064

Rahman, Ilyas, Hafis, M., Ilyas, A., Alwi, Z., Mustaniruddin, A., & Mukhtar. (2025). Dejihadization Through Hadīth Reinterpretation and the Experience of Former Radical-Terrorism Prisoners. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 15(1), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.151.24

Rahman, Widyawati, F., Hafis, M., Lon, Y. S., Alwi, Z., Ilyas, & Ilyas, A. (2025). Pathways to Tolerance: A Comparative Analysis of Hadith and Gospel in the Indonesian Context. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106.2. https://doi. org/10. 46222/pharosjot.106.2015

Ramdan, A. (2018). Aspek-Aspek Konstitusional Penodaan Agama Serta Pertanggungjawaban Pidananya di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(3), 616. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1538

Richards, P. S., Paloutzian, R. F., & Sanders, P. W. (2021). Mainstreaming the Assessment of Diverse Religiousness and Spirituality in Psychology. In Assessing Spirituality in a Diverse World (pp. 15–31). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52140-0_2

Rustam, R., Marlina, T., & Handoko, D. (2022). Sejarah Pembentukan Dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Dimensi, 11(2), 270–281. https://doi.org/10.33373/dms.v11i2.3973

Safa’at, M. A. (2022). The Roles of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Determining State-Religion Relations. Constitutional Review, 8(1), 113. https://doi. org/10.31078/consrev815

Sanjaya, D. (2024). Freedom of Religion and Belief in the Indonesian State of Law: Dualism of Conceptual Interpretation and Constitutional Court Decision. Jurnal Konstitusi Dan Demokrasi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jkd.v4i1.1402

Ulfah, S. M., & Syafitri, J. (2024). Nella Van den Brandt: Religion, Gender, and Race in Western European Arts and Culture: Thinking Through Religious Transformation Nella Van denBrandtReligion, Gender, and Race in Western European Arts and Culture: Thinking Through Religious TransformationL. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 37(2), 129–130. https://doi.org/10.18261/njrs.37.2.6

Yuliniar, S., Problematika, A., Terhadap, P., & Konstitusi, M. (2023). Analisis Problematika Pengawasan Terhadap Mahkamah Konstitusi. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(1), 2964–5107.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

How to Cite

JUDICIAL REVIEW PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG PENODAAN AGAMA (Fatimah Azzahra, Naela Rosita, & Amiratunil Khaira , Trans.). (2025). Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2(5), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.69714/dnpy5a78