PENDEKATAN METODE NORDIC BODY MAP DALAM IDENTIFIKASI RISIKO ERGONOMI (STUDI: KASUS PERAWAT POLI RS X)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69714/8b976d43Keywords:
Nordic Body Map, Ergonomics , Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs)Abstract
This study aims to determine the causes of the risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in poly nurses at Hospital X. This is because the activities of poly nurses often use manual handling and repetitive motions as well as lifting or moving patients and pushing patient wheelchairs when providing health services so that this condition can cause muscle injuries in poly nurses. Referring to this problem, an analysis was conducted on all poly nurses at Hospital X. This study is an observational study with a cross-sectional design, with a total sample of 30 nurses. The research method used is an analytical method using the Nordic Body Map (NBM) questionnaire. The results of the NBM analysis provide information on changes in the distribution of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) complaint levels. Based on the results of the study of ergonomic risks due to musculoskeletal disorders in poly nurses from 30 questions in the questionnaire, the researchers took six points that are at risk of injury and can interfere with nurses' activities, namely the nape of the neck with a score of 1 (56%), 2 (37%) and 3 (7%), neck with a score of 1 (67%), 2 (27%), 3 (8%), left and right shoulders with a score of 1 (67%), 2 (30%) and 3 (3%), back with a score of 1 (54%), 2 (10%), 3 (33%), 4 (3%) and waist with a score (1 (47%), 2 (23%), 3 (27%), 4 (3%), and pelvis with a score of 1 (77%), 2 (13%), 3 (7%), 4 (3%), which means no pain (not feeling any disturbance in a particular part) with a score of 1, somewhat pain (feeling a little disturbance or pain in a particular part) with a score of 2, pain (feeling discomfort in certain parts of the body) with a score of 3, and very painful (feeling discomfort in certain parts on a high scale) with a score of 4.
References
J. D. Borrero and S. Yousafzai, “Circular entrepreneurial ecosystems: a Quintuple Helix Model approach,” Manag. Decis., vol. 62, no. 13, pp. 141–177, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1108/MD-08-2023-1361.
J. Kuruneri and W. Zivanai, “An exploratory study of the concept of social procurement in the construction industry in Botswana: contractor’s perspective,” Mod. Supply Chain Res. Appl., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 63–83, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1108/MSCRA-06-2023-0025.
P. Velte, “Climate board governance and carbon assurance – European evidence,” J. Glob. Responsib., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 594–621, June 2025, doi: 10.1108/JGR-02-2024-0034.
S. Rowlinson and Y. A. Jia, “Construction accident causality: An institutional analysis of heat illness incidents on site,” Saf. Sci., vol. 78, pp. 179–189, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.021.
T. Polzer, P. Adhikari, C. P. Nguyen, and L. Gårseth-Nesbakk, “Adoption of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards in emerging economies and low-income countries: a structured literature review,” J. Public Budg. Account. Financ. Manag., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 309–332, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1108/JPBAFM-01-2021-0016.
K. Flowers, W. Van Zijl, A. J. Ram, and W. Maroun, “Analysing the disciplinary power of proactive monitoring bodies,” J. Account. Emerg. Econ., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 927–945, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1108/JAEE-04-2024-0187.
I. Kokina and J. Davidova, “Analysis of Latvian Organizational Culture in Relation to Leadership Gender Roles,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 106, pp. 445–455, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.050.
M. C. Giorgino, “‘And yet it moves!’ An institutional analysis of the Immobili’s motion towards hybridity,” J. Manag. Hist., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 87–115, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1108/JMH-07-2022-0024.
M. Kołodziejczak, “Coaching Across Organizational Culture,” Procedia Econ. Finance, vol. 23, pp. 329–334, 2015, doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00491-8.
M.-J. Moreno-Domínguez, T. Escobar-Rodríguez, Y.-M. Pelayo-Díaz, and I. Tovar-García, “Organizational culture and leadership style in Spanish Hospitals: Effects on knowledge management and efficiency,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 20, p. e39216, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39216.
L. Algabry, S. M. Alhabshi, Y. Soualhi, and A. H. A. Othman, “Assessing the effectiveness of internal Sharīʿah audit structure and its practices in Islamic financial institutions: a case study of Islamic banks in Yemen,” Asian J. Account. Res., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2–22, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1108/AJAR-04-2019-0025.
A. M. Susskind, R. A. Brymer, W. G. Kim, H. Y. Lee, and S. A. Way, “Attitudes and perceptions toward affirmative action programs: An application of institutional theory,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 38–48, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.04.003.
R. E. Potter et al., “Australia’s national laws for worker psychological health: a policy evaluation and psychosocial safety climate analysis,” Saf. Sci., vol. 191, no. 1, p. 106899, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106899.
S. Chong, I. Ali, A. K. Narayan, and I. M. Khudir, “Beyond the greenwash: institutional forces driving university SDG reporting,” Account. Res. J., vol. 16, 2025, doi: 10.1108/ARJ-02-2025-0040.
K. Fushimi, “Ceremonial implementation at overseas locations: a multi-case study of a bilateral development agency,” Int. J. Organ. Anal., vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 44–59, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJOA-07-2023-3822.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
