EFEKTIVITAS WHISTLEBLOWING DALAM MENCEGAH FRAUD: MEWUJUDKAN TRANSPARANSI DAN INTEGRITAS DI LINGKUNGAN KORPORASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69714/kzzff465Keywords:
Whistleblowing, Fraud, WhistleblowerAbstract
Whistleblowing according to Park et al. (2008) is reporting improper actions to individuals or organizations believed to have the power to stop it. Singleton (2010) defines fraud as the behavior of obtaining beneficial benefits intentionally by abusing work / position or taking assets / resources in the company. In the context of its implementation, whistleblowing is still questionable regarding its effectiveness in preventing fraud in the corporate environment, especially to create transparency and integrity. This study uses a qualitative method that focuses on reviewing the natural setting of a phenomenon that has occurred and produces a narrative description. The review shows that the lack of effectiveness of whistleblowing can be influenced by several factors, such as the lack of company socialization to employees; the absence of employee trust in the system; or the lack of whistleblower protection.
References
Aksa, Adi Faisal (2018). Pencegahan dan Deteksi Kasus Korupsi pada Sektor Publik dengan Fraud Triangle. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, dan Akuntansi (JEBA). Vol. 20 No. 4.
Aresteria, Maya (2018). Peran Audit Internal Dalam Pencegahan Fraud di Perguruan Tinggi: Literature Review. Jurnal Akuntansi, Ekonomi dan Manajemen Bisnis. Vol. 6 No. 1.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative research for education (Vol. 368). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed.
Indah, Ainun Komala (2023). Peran Bidang Investigasi Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan dalam Pencegahan Fraud dengan Menggunakan Fraud Control Plan (Studi Kasus pada BPKP DKI Jakarta)
Park, H., Blenkinsopp, J., Oktem, M. K., & Omurgonulsen, U. (2008). Cultural orientation and attitudes toward different forms of whistleblowing: A comparison of South Korea, Turkey, and the UK. Journal of business ethics, 82, 929-939.
Saleh, S. (2017). Analisis data kualitatif.
Sandi Ferry 2024, Audit KAP Lapkeu Indofarma Temukan Fraud & Kerugian Rp 371 M, CNBC Indonesia, diakses 2 Maret 2025.
Singleton, T. W., & Singleton, A. J. (2010). Fraud auditing and forensic accounting. John Wiley & Sons.
Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.
Sujana, I. K., Suardikha, I. M. S., & Laksmi, P. S. P. (2020). Whistleblowing System, Competence, Morality, and Internal Control System Against Fraud Prevention on Village Financial Management in Denpasar. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(11), 2780.
Talla, Allend, Pranatalindo Simajuntak, dan Sari Tamayani Tijo (2024). Peran Audit Internal untuk Pelaksanaan Pencegahan Fraud dengan Good Corporate Governance sebagai Variable Intervening pada Pt. Bank Pembangunan Daerah Maluku Dan Maluku Utara. Kumpulan Artikel Akuntansi. Vol. 5. No. 1
Utama, I. G., Ramantha, I. W., & Badera, I. D. (2018). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Dalam Perspektif Fraud Triangle Sebagai Prediktor Fraudulent Financial Reporting. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana.
Wardani, C. A. & Sulhani (2017). Analisis Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penerapan Whistleblowing System Di Indonesia. Jurnal Aset (Akuntansi Riset) Vol.9 No. 1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Akuntansi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
