FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMENGARUHI KUALITAS LABA PADA INDUSTRI BERISIKO LINGKUNGAN TINGGI: TINJAUAN LITERATUR

Authors

  • Adli Rikanda Saputra UIN Raden Intan Lampung Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69714/gven1k13

Keywords:

earnings quality, environmental risk, carbon emissions, earnings management, carbon risk, environmental regulation, environmentally high-risk industries

Abstract

This review aims to synthesize the existing literature on factors influencing earnings quality in environmentally high-risk industries. These industries, including energy, mining, chemicals, heavy manufacturing, and utilities, face increasing pressure from carbon risk, carbon emissions, environmental regulation, public scrutiny, and sustainability reporting demands. This review adopts a structured literature review approach by examining relevant empirical and theoretical studies obtained from academic databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, SSRN, and Google Scholar. The literature was analyzed thematically to identify major determinants, theoretical perspectives, methodological trends, and future research gaps. The findings indicate that carbon risk and emission exposure generally reduce earnings quality through higher earnings management; however, this relationship is not linear and depends on governance quality, regulatory uncertainty, environmental performance, and institutional context. Environmental regulation and political costs also influence managerial reporting incentives, while environmental performance and CSR initiatives tend to improve earnings quality, although substitution between accrual-based and real earnings management remains an important concern. Investor attention, external monitoring, environmental disclosure, board financial literacy, executive compensation, internal control quality, and audit quality further moderate the relationship between environmental risk and earnings quality. This review concludes that earnings quality in environmentally high-risk industries is shaped by the interaction between environmental pressure, managerial incentives, governance mechanisms, and institutional context. Future research should expand the geographical and sectoral scope, adopt multidimensional earnings quality measures, and employ stronger causal identification strategies

References

[1] W. Cao, M. Linnenluecke, J. Tian, R. Xue, dan H. Yang, “How does investor attention affect energy firms’ managerial opportunistic behavior? New evidence from China,” Bus Strat Env, vol. 32, no. 7, hlm. 5025–5043, Nov 2023, doi: 10.1002/bse.3406.

[2] A. Issa, A. Wael Al‐Khatib, dan M. A. A. Zaid, “Earnings Quality, Emissions, and Executive Compensation in European Firms With Say‐on‐Pay Voting Adoption,” J Corp Accounting Finance, vol. 36, no. 2, hlm. 249–261, Apr 2025, doi: 10.1002/jcaf.22768.

[3] Y. Wang, Z. Wu, dan G. Zhang, “Firms and climate change: a review of carbon risk in corporate finance,” Carb Neutrality, vol. 1, no. 1, hlm. 6, Des 2022, doi: 10.1007/s43979-022-00005-9.

[4] J. Du, X. Dai, dan B. Yan, “The Impact of Government Participation in Ecological Championship on Heavily-Polluting Corporate Earnings Management: Evidence from China’s National Civilized City Award,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 22, hlm. 16113, Nov 2023, doi: 10.3390/su152216113.

[5] A. Hassanein, K. A. Nimer, dan K. Hussainey, “Guest editorial: Toward a better understanding of sustainability accounting in the energy industry,” JFRA, vol. 22, no. 1, hlm. 1–6, Feb 2024, doi: 10.1108/JFRA-03-2024-643.

[6] S. Tutar, H. Tutar, D. A. Keskin, Y. Bilan, dan D. Streimikiene, “Relationship Between Earnings Quality and Sustainability of Companies,” Corp Soc Responsibility Env, vol. 32, no. 4, hlm. 4923–4941, Jul 2025, doi: 10.1002/csr.3211.

[7] P. Velte, “Environmental performance, carbon performance and earnings management: Empirical evidence for the European capital market,” Corp Soc Responsibility Env, vol. 28, no. 1, hlm. 42–53, Jan 2021, doi: 10.1002/csr.2030.

[8] P. Velte, “Corporate social responsibility ( CSR ) and earnings management: A structured literature review with a focus on contextual factors,” Corp Soc Responsibility Env, vol. 31, no. 6, hlm. 6000–6018, Nov 2024, doi: 10.1002/csr.2903.

[9] S.-I. Kim dan Y. Kim, “Climate Risk, Stock Crash Risk, and Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Scheme: Evidence From Korea,” Sage Open, vol. 13, no. 4, hlm. 21582440231199377, Okt 2023, doi: 10.1177/21582440231199377.

[10] I. D. M. Izwan, N. B. Azman, N. B. Zakaria, dan F. A. Ghapar, “Confluence of Board Members’ Financial Literacy, Corporate Environmental Disclosure, and Financial Reporting Quality,” J. of Law and Sust. Develop., vol. 12, no. 1, hlm. e2220, Jan 2024, doi: 10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2220.

[11] . C., T. Lestari, dan W. Mulyasari, “CSR DISCLOSURE AND COST OF CAPITAL : THE MEDIATING ROLE OF EARNINGS QUALITY,” j. inf. perpajak. akunt. keuang. n.a., vol. 16, no. 2, hlm. 223–244, Jul 2021, doi: 10.25105/jipak.v16i2.9152.

[12] R. I. Akintoye dan S. K. Kassim, “Sustainability and Financial Reporting Quality for Listed Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria: The Legitimacy Theory Perspective,” ujaf, vol. 10, no. 4, hlm. 811–819, Jul 2022, doi: 10.13189/ujaf.2022.100403.

[13] B. Litt, D. Sharma, dan V. Sharma, “Environmental initiatives and earnings management,” Managerial Auditing Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, hlm. 76–106, Des 2013, doi: 10.1108/MAJ-05-2013-0867.

[14] Q. Do, N. D. Cao, D. Gounopoulos, dan D. Newton, “Environmental Concern, Regulations and Board Diversity,” Review of Corporate Finance, vol. 3, no. 1–2, hlm. 99–148, Mei 2023, doi: 10.1561/114.00000037.

[15] H. Ren, “Sustainable Development and Accounting Conservatism,” J Corp Accounting Finance, vol. 36, no. 4, hlm. 232–246, Okt 2025, doi: 10.1002/jcaf.22804.

[16] Z. Zhang dan B. Sun, “Climate Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Disclosure Strategies: Evidence From Financial Statement Comparability,” Corp Soc Responsibility Env, vol. 32, no. 3, hlm. 3905–3927, Mei 2025, doi: 10.1002/csr.3164.

[17] S. J. Gray, N. Hellman, dan M. N. Ivanova, “Extractive Industries Reporting: A Review of Accounting Challenges and the Research Literature,” Abacus, vol. 55, no. 1, hlm. 42–91, Mar 2019, doi: 10.1111/abac.12147.

[18] A. Iazzi, A. Papa, R. Palladino, dan S. Lamusta, “Evaluating Companies’ Impression Management Tactics in Mandatory Sustainability Reporting,” Bus Strat Env, vol. 34, no. 6, hlm. 6828–6848, Sep 2025, doi: 10.1002/bse.4326.

[19] C. Isaboke, Y. Chen, dan A. Bagonza, “Carbon Disclosures and Industry Environment Sensitivity on Firm Performance,” GLCE, vol. 3, no. 3, hlm. 283–294, Agu 2023, doi: 10.47852/bonviewGLCE3202930.

[20] G. P. M. Virgilio, “You Need Three Butterflies to Cause a Hurricane,” Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, vol. 67, no. 1, hlm. 139, Mar 2020, doi: 10.47743/saeb-2020-0006.

[21] H. Al-Shaer, “Do environmental-related disclosures help enhance investment recommendations?: UK-based evidence,” JFRA, vol. 16, no. 1, hlm. 217–244, Mar 2018, doi: 10.1108/JFRA-03-2016-0020.

[22] M. Breitenstein, D. K. Nguyen, dan T. Walther, “Environmental Hazards and Risk Management in the Financial Sector: A Systematic Literature Review,” SSRN Journal, 2019, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3428953.

[23] C. Liu, Z. Zhou, K. Su, K. Liu, dan H. An, “Water risk and financial analysts’ information environment: Empirical evidence from China,” Bus Strat Env, vol. 33, no. 2, hlm. 1265–1304, Feb 2024, doi: 10.1002/bse.3539.

[24] H. Chen, X. Tan, dan Q. Cao, “Air pollution, auditors’ pessimistic bias and audit quality: evidence from China,” SAMPJ, vol. 12, no. 1, hlm. 74–104, Jan 2021, doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2019-0277.

[25] C. Y. Chung, T. H. Le, dan T. H. V. Nguyen, “Climate Risk Exposure and Firm Default Risk: OECD Insights into the Moderating Role of Innovation,” Asia-Pac J of Fin Stud, vol. 54, no. 5, hlm. 570–596, Okt 2025, doi: 10.1111/ajfs.70020.

[26] S. F. A. Khatib, I. H. M. Ismail, N. Salameh, A. F. Abbas, A. H. Bazhair, dan H. G. H. Sulimany, “Carbon Emission and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Management Environmental Training,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 13, hlm. 10485, Jul 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151310485.

[27] E. Kim, “The Relationship between the Greenhouse Gas and Energy Target Management System and Foreign Ownership: Investor Sensitivity to the Implementation of the System,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 6, hlm. 2368, Mar 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16062368.

[28] N. Khaq, N. Sasongko, dan D. Triyono, “The Effect of Earning Management on Carbon Emmision Disclosure with Corporate Governance as a Moderation Variable:,” dipresentasikan pada International Conference on Economics and Business Studies (ICOEBS 2022), Surakarta, Indonesia, 2022. doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.220602.018.

[29] K. Boonlert‐U‐Thai, A. Suriyawong, dan S. Treepongkaruna, “From Smoke to Stock: Effect of PM 2.5 on Firm Performance,” Sustainable Development, vol. 33, no. 6, hlm. 8316–8328, Des 2025, doi: 10.1002/sd.70101.

[30] J. Zhang, “Corporate carbon emissions and market value,” Sci Rep, vol. 15, no. 1, hlm. 30593, Agu 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16455-x.

[31] M. Negash, “IFRS and environmental accounting,” Management Research Review, vol. 35, no. 7, hlm. 577–601, Jun 2012, doi: 10.1108/01409171211238811.

[32] C. Khiari, I. Khanchel, H. Rjiba, J. D. Lotto, dan N. Hussain, “Climate Change Risk and Financial Market Response: An International Evidence From Performance Forecasts by Financial Analysts,” Journal of Forecasting, vol. 44, no. 8, hlm. 2315–2330, Des 2025, doi: 10.1002/for.70003.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026

How to Cite

FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMENGARUHI KUALITAS LABA PADA INDUSTRI BERISIKO LINGKUNGAN TINGGI: TINJAUAN LITERATUR (Adli Rikanda Saputra, Trans.). (2026). Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 3(3), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.69714/gven1k13