Studi Komparatif antara Metode Cost Plus Pricing dan Target Costing dalam Penetapan Harga Jual Produk

Authors

  • Pantja Adiguna Muharam Univesitas Bina Sarana Informatika Author
  • Ronaldo Dwi Chandra Situmorang Univesitas Bina Sarana Informatika Author
  • Irma Sesiliya Univesitas Bina Sarana Informatika Author
  • Bunga Larasati Author
  • Husni Mubarok Univesitas Bina Sarana Informatika Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69714/4j6m7h39

Keywords:

Penetapan Harga, Cost Plus Pricing, Target Costing, Akuntansi Manajemen, Strategi Harga

Abstract

Pricing is an important component of marketing strategy and is essential for business sustainability. Cost Plus Pricing and Target Costing are the two most common techniques for determining selling prices. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the two methods in determining the selling price of goods, especially considering the aspects of cost through documentation, interviews, and financial statement analysis. The results of the study indicate that Target Costing focuses on cost efficiency to achieve the desired market price, while the Cost Plus Pricing method tends to produce higher selling prices but is less competitive in the market. The results of the study indicate that the pricing method must be adjusted to the characteristics of the.

References

Ansari,S.L.,Bell,J.E.,&theCAM-ITargetCostCoreGroup. (1997). Target Costing: The Next Frontier in Strategic Cost Management. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2017.1354235.

Burritt, R. L., & Saka, C. 2006. Environmental Management Accounting Applications and Ecoefficiency: Case Studies Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1262–1275.

Diyah Santi Hariyani, . (2019), AKUNTANSI MANAJEMEN, Aditya Media Publishing, 978-602-52843-1-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.08.012.

Hilton,R.W.,&Platt,D.E. (2011). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1995.1024.

Interactive Control in Target Cost Management: An Empirical Study of Japanese Practices. Management Accounting Research, 6(4), 399–414.

Nurul Fauziyyah, . (2022), Efek Digitalisasi Terhadap Akuntansi Manajemen, Jurnal Politeknik Caltex Riau, Vol. 15, No. 1

Phan, T. N., Baird, K., & Su, S. 2017. The Use and Effectiveness of Environmental Management Accounting. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 0(0), 1–20.

Sari,M.M.,&Ghozali,I. (2016). Pengaruh Metode Penetapan Harga terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan: Studi Komparatif antara Target Costing dan Cost Plus Pricing. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 4(2), 150–162. Tani, T. (1995).

Downloads

Published

2025-06-11

How to Cite

Studi Komparatif antara Metode Cost Plus Pricing dan Target Costing dalam Penetapan Harga Jual Produk (Pantja Adiguna Muharam, Ronaldo Dwi Chandra Situmorang, Irma Sesiliya, Bunga Larasati, & Husni Mubarok , Trans.). (2025). Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 2(3), 66-69. https://doi.org/10.69714/4j6m7h39